I'm in a bit of a sticky situation. We had initially wanted a destination wedding, but due to lack of response and FH's father's health issues, we canceled that idea and are now doing a local celebration.
When sending save the dates for the destination, we were pretty generous, knowing only about 35%-40% would accept. I also sent a few "heads up" messages to people telling them that we'd be having an at-home reception when we got back. Not an official save the date, but if they were traveling, I wanted to let them know so they could budget for it.
Now that we're doing local, there are a ton of people to whom we sent save the dates that we simply cannot afford. (Long story, but we jumped at a venue because, after canceling the destination, I was paranoid about finding a place in 2020 that also worked with our photographer's availability).
How horrible would it be to send fewer save the dates for our local wedding? I know that, generally, if one receives a Save the Date they expect an invitation. I'm wondering if, etiquette-wise, there's a bit of leeway for the venue change? We have an initial guest list, but we need to cut about 14-16 from an 84 person list. This means that they're are people who received the destination STDs won't get local ones. Or am I obligated to send save the dates (and invites) to these people?
Post content has been hidden
To unblock this content, please click here
Related articles
Wedding Registry
11 Questions to Ask Your Wedding Registry Consultant
There’s more to registering than choosing stuff. Get up to speed by asking your...