believe we’ve (FINALLY!) found our photographer, however we’re not
debating between if we want one photographer, or two and if 8 hours will
be enough time.
Our ceremony will begin at 4pm, and our
ceremony venue and reception venue are the same. Photos of us getting
ready would be nice, but I don’t need a million of them.. and my fiancé
will probably be getting ready across the city. PLUS two of my bridesmaids are photographers, so I thought they could just take photos of me getting ready between them getting ready. My thought is two
photographers for 8 hours doesn’t give them much time to take photos of
us both getting ready and I’d rather ensure we get the dances/bouquet
toss/garter/cake cutting than too many getting ready photos.
My sister and one of my best friends do photography so I’m not worried about me getting ready since they can just take a few for me so we don’t waste photo hours with our photographer (as long as I have a photo or two of my dress I’ll be happy!)
Did anyone get two photographers
and think they’d have been okay with one, or vice versa? The only thing
I’d really like is my fiance’s reaction AND a photo of me walking down
the aisle- do you think one photographer could manage that?
It's also $1000 more for a second photographer for 8 hours ($2900), or $3500 for 2 for 10 hours. We don't want to spend a fortune, and only had about $2500 budgeted for a photographer.
& Do you think 8hrs would be enough with one photographer if we did a 2-10, or 2:30-10:30 ish?